"Simon Peyton-Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, > | .NET is a different beast from other calling conventions in > | that you may want to compile Haskell ccalls to .NET > | intermediate language. In other words, it is about being > | able to implement ccall *on* .NET. Thus, the mix. > > I think that is exactly the issue. > > | At the moment, there doesn't seem to be much support for > | [lib]. The last message from SimonPJ (a while ago) on this > | issues also seems to indicate that he isn't to bothered about > | it. But AFAIK he is away at the moment. > > So let's omit it for now; but we will need to think about what to > do when someone really does do a Haskell-on-.NET binding.
So, overall this point is settled, then; implying that we stick with Alastair's recent change of the spec in that regard. Manuel _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi