Alastair Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
> I think the thing to do is add the existing performGC to the standard
> (perhaps giving it an hs_ prefix in the process) and leave development
> of an extended version of the function for when the GHC folk (or
> anyone else with a generational collector) decide they want a
> forcefulness argument. Come that day, we'd define:
>
> void performGC(void) { performPartialGC(0); }
>
> (or whatever it is you do to force a full collection).
Ok. So, how about
void hs_perform_gc (void);
with the following specification:
The function hs_perform_gc() advices the Haskell storage
manager to perform a garbage collection. This function
must not be invoked from C functions that are imported
"unsafe" into Haskell code.
Do you want a stronger wording on what kind of garbage
collection is to be performed or do we want to keep it
deliberately unspecified (ie, leave it to the individual
Haskell system)?
Cheers,
Manuel
_______________________________________________
FFI mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
