> Then I'll reformulate my question as a patch. [...] > Is there anything fundamentally wrong with this approach?
I still maintain that getting this to work, testing it and, especially, maintaining it is a lot of work. [For example, you mention that finalizers that point to the object they finalize don't work. I guess we could fix that by adding GHC-style WeakPtrs.] I don't think it's appropriate to add that burden just so we can call free at the right time. We have a simple problem, there should be a simple solution. A _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
