On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 11:03:36PM +1100, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > Hence, I propose to leave the definition in the spec as it > was; ie, the equality of ForeignPtrs is defined via the > vanilla pointer that they encapsulate.
However, if you generalize ForeignPtrs (which I hope you will) this would require Eq on the underlying type. I guess this is no great hardship for the types people want to use it with. _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
