On Tuesday 23 Mar 2004 12:51 am, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote: > We might want to accumulate extra useful functions in the implementation > in an *extra* module and once there is enough interesting functionality > in there, we can start talking about Version 1.1 of the Addendum. > > Does this sound like a sensible approach?
Oops, I forgot to answer your main question. Yes, that seems to be a reasonable approach to me. I don't think anybody expects the official FFI documentation to updated piecemeal whenever a new function is added. But it would be nice if all FFI implementations agreed (informally) on what extensions they were going to implement. Regards -- Adrian Hey _______________________________________________ FFI mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ffi
