On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > > > > about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one > > > > we should check if theres any software left around that still uses > > the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider > > to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused > > Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or in > the > OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway. > > I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this deprecated > stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is quite > ugly. > An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément pointed > in > another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav.
probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB You can kill me, but you cannot change the truth.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel