On 24.09.2014 13:16, Nicolas George wrote:
Le primidi 1er vendémiaire, an CCXXIII, Thomas Volkert a écrit :
There were enough votes declining this fast patch. That's okay.
Yes, you are right. This patch could cause some confusion in the future.
See https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3936 for the origin of this patch.
The idea/patch is no longer pursued.
Thanks for the explanations. I see this in the ticket discussion:
# this structure is needed to use also proprietary RTP packetizers beside the
# ones from ffmpeg.
This looks interesting. Can you explain what is missing from the API to be
able to use them? And also: what packetizer are missing from FFmpeg?
For example, support for H.261 and H.265/HEVC were missing.
Both packetizing schemes are supported now.
Best regards,
Thomas.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
