On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 02:49:30PM +0100, Christophe Gisquet wrote: > Hi, > > 2014-10-26 19:20 GMT+01:00 Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>: > > I took the liberty to apply the patch and fix the bug instead of > > leaving it open until someone succeeds writing a fate test for it > > Hi, I wonder whether this should be reverted for now (and ticket #2970 > reopened at the same time).
The patch fixes decoder artifacts, i dont think we should just revert it unless it causes artifacts in some other (known to be good) file > > I have been checking how to produce interlaced content through the > encoder, and the current table produces worse results (PSNR-wise, but > it was big enough to not bother checking visually). > > I don't know if that's an encoder issue yet or if the decoder table is > still incorrect. did you try to decode with a "known to be correct" decoder ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws. -- Plato
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
