On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 05:38:34PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 09/11/14 5:28 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 08:39:35PM +0100, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
> >> ---
> >> libswscale/x86/swscale.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/libswscale/x86/swscale.c b/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> >> index 8ce87b3..c9f3b1a 100644
> >> --- a/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> >> +++ b/libswscale/x86/swscale.c
> >> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ switch(c->dstBpc){ \
> >> case 16: do_16_case;
> >> break; \
> >> case 10: if (!isBE(c->dstFormat)) vscalefn = ff_yuv2planeX_10_ ##
> >> opt; break; \
> >> case 9: if (!isBE(c->dstFormat)) vscalefn = ff_yuv2planeX_9_ ##
> >> opt; break; \
> >> - default: if (condition_8bit) /*vscalefn = ff_yuv2planeX_8_ ##
> >> opt;*/ break; \
> >> + case 8: if (condition_8bit) vscalefn = ff_yuv2planeX_8_ ## opt;
> >> break; \
> >
> > doesnt work:
> > for example this generates a funny colored output and seems to not
> > look the same when run multiple times
> > ffmpeg -f lavfi -i testsrc -t 1 test.avi
>
> Fate passes with this patch applied. Shouldn't a test that can detect this be
> added then?hmm, i wonder why none of the existing tests caught this either way, one should be added [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Awnsering whenever a program halts or runs forever is On a turing machine, in general impossible (turings halting problem). On any real computer, always possible as a real computer has a finite number of states N, and will either halt in less than N cycles or never halt.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
