On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 01:41:13PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:19:32AM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > > On 17.11.2014, at 02:37, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 06:16:03PM +0100, Reimar Döffinger wrote: > > >> 11674 -> 10877 decicycles on my Phenom II. > > >> Overall speedup was unfortunately within measurement error. > > > > > > here its 10153 ->10135 > > > > I suspect it also depends a bit on the compiler and how it changes the > > surrounding code. > > Note that I also tested with PIC actually. > > > > > but ive a slightly odd feeling about the chnages to the asm code, > > > iam not sure if all assemblers will be happy about the changed > > > code > > > > Do you mean particularly the movzbl change? > > yes and the k stuff > > > > I am also unsure about that, I think there was a reason for that %k6 mess... > > But this as well as movzx seemed to work for me... > > it works here too i just have the feeling it might fail on some odd > assembler or platform. Thats not meant to keep you from pushing this > just that it might require to be reverted or fixed if such > problems actually occor
I pushed it. If anyone sees issues please tell me and I'll look into it! _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel