> That's with Timo's patch and with hard-coding the darWidth and darHeight
> to 1024x576. Same result.

Which patch did you use? The old one, that didn't take the width/height
into account, or the newer one?
The original one definitely was not correct.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to