On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote:
> Hi all > > its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6 > if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last > chance ;) > > About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random > scientist from the list i have from past suggestions > > Since it not having been part of a release was an argument for allowing to break API to fix the default for writing the colr atom (which a number of people found more sensible), it would be nice to have that in before, because otherwise that argument would no longer hold after 2.6 is out, resulting in a rather bad situation with both options in there for a while. How much time would there be to submit a patch that changes the default? _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
