On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 5:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at>
wrote:

> Hi all
>
> its a while since FFmpeg 2.5, so its getting time to make 2.6
> if you want something in it or something fixed, now is your last
> chance ;)
>
> About the name if noone suggests something then ill pick a random
> scientist from the list i have from past suggestions
>
>
Since it not having been part of a release was an argument for allowing to
break API to fix the default for writing the colr atom (which a number of
people found more sensible), it would be nice to have that in before,
because otherwise that argument would no longer hold after 2.6 is out,
resulting in a rather bad situation with both options in there for a while.
How much time would there be to submit a patch that changes the default?
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

Reply via email to