ons 2020-06-24 klockan 21:22 +0200 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos: > Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 21:10 Uhr schrieb rcombs <rco...@rcombs.me>: > > --- > > libavutil/avutil.h | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/libavutil/avutil.h b/libavutil/avutil.h > > index 4d633156d1..c11b33f466 100644 > > --- a/libavutil/avutil.h > > +++ b/libavutil/avutil.h > > @@ -257,7 +257,11 @@ const char *av_get_media_type_string(enum AVMediaType > > media_type); > > * Internal time base represented as fractional value > > */ > > > > +#ifdef __cplusplus > > +#define AV_TIME_BASE_Q AVRational{1, AV_TIME_BASE} > > +#else > > #define AV_TIME_BASE_Q (AVRational){1, AV_TIME_BASE} > > +#endif > > The problem with this patch is that it gives C++ users of the libraries > the feeling that we would care about them and that we would indeed > fix issues. > Given that the contrary is true (at least in the past) and that we do > not do any specific C++ testing, I believe it is better to let users > work around this issue (from their point of you).
Maybe we should put in a #warning to that effect? Inside an #ifdef __cplusplus /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".