ons 2020-06-24 klockan 21:22 +0200 skrev Carl Eugen Hoyos:
> Am Mi., 24. Juni 2020 um 21:10 Uhr schrieb rcombs <rco...@rcombs.me>:
> > ---
> >  libavutil/avutil.h | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/libavutil/avutil.h b/libavutil/avutil.h
> > index 4d633156d1..c11b33f466 100644
> > --- a/libavutil/avutil.h
> > +++ b/libavutil/avutil.h
> > @@ -257,7 +257,11 @@ const char *av_get_media_type_string(enum AVMediaType 
> > media_type);
> >   * Internal time base represented as fractional value
> >   */
> > 
> > +#ifdef __cplusplus
> > +#define AV_TIME_BASE_Q          AVRational{1, AV_TIME_BASE}
> > +#else
> >  #define AV_TIME_BASE_Q          (AVRational){1, AV_TIME_BASE}
> > +#endif
> 
> The problem with this patch is that it gives C++ users of the libraries
> the feeling that we would care about them and that we would indeed
> fix issues.
> Given that the contrary is true (at least in the past) and that we do
> not do any specific C++ testing, I believe it is better to let users
> work around this issue (from their point of you).

Maybe we should put in a #warning to that effect? Inside an #ifdef
__cplusplus

/Tomas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to