Marton Balint (12020-07-27): > If I understand correctly, you are speaking about URL handling in general > all over the codebase, and not only ff_make_absolute_url.
I thought that was what you were speaking in the first place. ff_make_absolute_url() only does what the caller wants, the caller decides the size of the buffer, and we can be sure it is shorter than the concatenation of both parts. > I think we understand the concept. It just seems a tiny bit heavy weight, or > at least that was the primary concern as far as I remember. That's because I made the mistake of showing the implementation and talking about the benefits. The implementation is my problem (and whoever would succeed me if I were to stop maintaining it, but if it is accepted, I do not intend to). The benefits are for everybody. Please have a look at the other mail I just sent, where I show the benefits and keep the implementation for myself. Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
