On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, at 00:29, Alexander Strasser wrote: > Definitions of non-obvious data should have a short comment > explaining their origin. > > If the data is of mathematical origin, you can document that > or use code snippets or pseudo-code. If the data was gained > empirically, describe the methods used. If the data was taken > from a document like a specification, reference the section > and/or table number. A link can also be used, if there is a > stable source and there are no better ways. > > If you generated the data with a program, consider including > the source code in FFmpeg and reference it in the comment. > > Typical examples are tables of numbers. Here is one: > > <nice example to be found and inserted> > > > I feel it could well be improved, though I wasn't able to do it > myself :( Maybe others can help.
What about RE values? -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf - President +33 672 704 734 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
