ons 2021-01-20 klockan 00:27 +0100 skrev Marton Balint: > > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, Tobias Rapp wrote: > > > On 18.01.2021 23:53, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > lör 2021-01-16 klockan 08:43 +0800 skrev lance.lmw...@gmail.com: > > > > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 09:43:58PM +0100, Marton Balint wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021, Tomas Härdin wrote: > > > > > > Again, why? If you have a company that maintains a fork of FFmpeg > > > > > > then > > > > > > compile that info in here instead. Compare with FFmbc which always > > > > > > puts > > > > > > "FFmbc" as CompanyName. > > > > > > > > > > And how can a product based on libavformat set the company name, > > > > > product > > > > > name and product version? It seems a valid use case for me that these > > > > > are > > > > > overridable. Also note that this product version is only the "user > > friendly" > > > > > version string, for the numeric version still LIBAVFORMAT_VERSION > > > > > values > > are > > > > > used. > > > > > > > > Yes, my use case is the product is using libavformat as library, so it's > > > > prefer to have way to override these information as requirements. > > > > > > What I'm worried about here is that we're going to get files which > > > claim to have been written by something other than libavformat. I've > > > had situations like this before, and it is a source of headache. For > > > example, if mxfenc writes some field incorrectly then this might cause > > > us to hack mxfdec to accept that field instead of fixing mxfenc. > > > > I agree that especially for the MXF format with its flexible structure > > it is more relevant to know the muxing library rather than the hosting > > application. Have seen MXF output files of other commercial products > > that also contain library identifiers like "libMXF" or "MXFtk" here. > > > > Other formats in FFmpeg use the "encoder" metadata key for embedding > > library information in the output file. A quick test with AVI output > > shows that this metadata is generated internally and cannot be > > overridden on the command-line. > > If your concern is being able to identify our mxf muxer, then why not use > the Platform metadata item for this? > > "Human readable name of the toolkit and operating system used. Best > practice is to use the form “SDK name (OS name)”"
Where is this text from? Neither S377m-2004 nor RP210v10-2007 says this. /Tomas _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
