> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of Nicolas > George > Sent: 2021年3月1日 22:51 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V3 3/3] libavfilter: add filter dnn_detect > for object detection > > Guo, Yejun (12021-03-01): > > Hi, glad to hear there's a good solution, could you share a bit of > > code as an example, it would be nice if I could refine my code better > > when possible, thanks. > > The best choice is to go with BoundingBox boxes[], as Andreas pointed, and see > if people who use compilers where it does not work manifest. > Probably they will not, and if they do we can decide if we want to continue > supporting these obsolete compilers.
thanks, I will try this one. > > The second best choice is to go with BoundingBox boxes[1], if it is not proven > that the compiler can make assumptions that will break the code. > > The third choice would be something like: > > #define BOX(p, i) (((BoundingBox *)&(p)->boxes)[i]) > > or similar. But best try to make the best choice work. > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
