Signed-off-by: Andreas Rheinhardt <andreas.rheinha...@outlook.com> --- What is actually the reason that we stick to this C90 rule? Is it because of compability with ancient compilers? (Given that we already require several C99 features, I doubt that there are compilers which would fail if we stopped adhering to the declaration-before-statement rule.) Or is it because it is presumed that it improves clarity and readability?
fftools/ffmpeg.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/fftools/ffmpeg.c b/fftools/ffmpeg.c index e0f2fe138f..6f6e002604 100644 --- a/fftools/ffmpeg.c +++ b/fftools/ffmpeg.c @@ -4234,10 +4234,11 @@ static int get_input_packet(InputFile *f, AVPacket **pkt) float scale = f->rate_emu ? 1.0 : f->readrate; for (i = 0; i < f->nb_streams; i++) { InputStream *ist = input_streams[f->ist_index + i]; + int64_t stream_ts_offset, pts, now; if (!ist->nb_packets) continue; - int64_t stream_ts_offset = FFMAX(ist->first_dts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE ? ist->first_dts : 0, file_start); - int64_t pts = av_rescale(ist->dts, 1000000, AV_TIME_BASE); - int64_t now = (av_gettime_relative() - ist->start)*scale + stream_ts_offset; + stream_ts_offset = FFMAX(ist->first_dts != AV_NOPTS_VALUE ? ist->first_dts : 0, file_start); + pts = av_rescale(ist->dts, 1000000, AV_TIME_BASE); + now = (av_gettime_relative() - ist->start) * scale + stream_ts_offset; if (pts > now) return AVERROR(EAGAIN); } -- 2.27.0 _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".