On 2/5/2022 6:09 PM, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 01:26:18PM -0800, Chad Fraleigh wrote:
>> Since any [valid] value over 255 is impossible in the IPv4 protocol (the TTL 
>> field is only 8-bits), it should always be capped at 255 (for consistency) 
>> or return an invalid value error (the one I would suggest).
>>
> 
> zhilizhao have submit a patch to limit the range of ttl from option. Do you 
> want
> to return an invalid error here still?

If it can never be called with an invalid value, not even programmatically if 
someone links against the ffmpeg libs, then checking it is unneeded. But also 
checking it to limit the unsigned char value would be redundant, so only the 
value cast would be needed, i.e.:

   ttl = (unsigned char) mcastTTL;


If however, it could be called without being first limited, then returning an 
error would be best to avoid silently having unexpected results. Also, checking 
that it isn't negative should be done in that case. Not counting pending 
patches, I only see udp_open() calls it, so if it's already bound in there, no 
extra checks are needed.

Of course, these are only suggestions, since I'm a nobody. =)


>> Despite VLC's reversed comment, using an int seems to be the exception to 
>> the rule (i.e. only linux and windows seem to use it [as-documented]), 
>> perhaps doing the unsigned char first and using the int as the fallback 
>> would be better? It's not really just a BSD thing, unless you also count 
>> LWIP and Solaris as BSD. Unless VLC's code history shows them doing it this 
>> way at one time and swapping it (but forgetting the comment) to fix a known 
>> bug?
>>
> 
> I have blamed vlc code and sure the code doing it this way at one 
> time(104938796a3). 
> For the mismatch of code and comments, I prefer to code always as code were 
> build 
> and used by all kinds of system which vlc is supported already. 
> 
> As for use BSD, I prefer to count LWIP and Solaris into BSD category which 
> using
> rule of byte. If you still prefer to add them into comments, I'm OK also. 
> 
>>
>> On 2/4/2022 9:28 PM, lance.lmw...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> From: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Suggested by zhilizhao, vlc project has solved the compatibility by
>>> the same way, so I borrowed the comments from vlc project.
>>>
>>> Fix #ticket9449
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Limin Wang <lance.lmw...@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  libavformat/udp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libavformat/udp.c b/libavformat/udp.c
>>> index 3dc79eb..34488d6 100644
>>> --- a/libavformat/udp.c
>>> +++ b/libavformat/udp.c
>>> @@ -164,6 +164,10 @@ static int udp_set_multicast_ttl(int sockfd, int 
>>> mcastTTL,
>>>  {
>>>      int protocol, cmd;
>>>  
>>> +    /* There is some confusion in the world whether IP_MULTICAST_TTL
>>> +     * takes a byte or an int as an argument.
>>> +     * BSD seems to indicate byte so we are going with that and use
>>> +     * int as a fallback to be safe */
>>>      switch (addr->sa_family) {
>>>  #ifdef IP_MULTICAST_TTL
>>>          case AF_INET:
>>> @@ -183,8 +187,15 @@ static int udp_set_multicast_ttl(int sockfd, int 
>>> mcastTTL,
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      if (setsockopt(sockfd, protocol, cmd, &mcastTTL, sizeof(mcastTTL)) < 
>>> 0) {
>>> -        ff_log_net_error(logctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "setsockopt");
>>> -        return ff_neterrno();
>>> +        /* BSD compatibility */
>>> +        unsigned char ttl;
>>> +
>>> +        ff_log_net_error(logctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "setsockopt");
>>> +        ttl = (unsigned char)(( mcastTTL > 255 ) ? 255 : mcastTTL);
>>> +        if (setsockopt(sockfd, protocol, cmd, &ttl, sizeof(ttl)) < 0) {
>>> +            ff_log_net_error(logctx, AV_LOG_ERROR, "setsockopt");
>>> +            return ff_neterrno();
>>> +        }
>>>      }
>>>  
>>>      return 0;
>> _______________________________________________
>> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
>> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
>> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>>
>> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
>> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
> 
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to