On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 12:45:35PM +0200, Jerome Martinez wrote: > Le 14/05/2015 18:57, Michael Niedermayer a écrit : > >[...] > >>+reserved > >the reserved bit is not defined, > >This way one could misunderstand it as if it was allowed to add > >such bits in the encoder > > I don't see it as something allowed (i.e. as a "user data" for > private use) but you're right, it is not defined and it should be. > Renamed asreserved_for_future_useLyX Document and added > > LyX Document reserved_for_future_use has semantics that are reserved > for future use. > Encoders conforming to this version of this specification SHALL > NOT write this value. > Decoders conforming to this version of this specification SHALL > ignore its value.
> ffv1.lyx | 583 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 521 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-) > 36acaf2fbaf74a115571b7260df37c3a21b58c64 > 0001-Add-more-details-about-the-configuration-record.patch > From ebe963b70474e2f850223d93cce97d82c3b95990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: =?UTF-8?q?J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me=20Martinez?= <jer...@mediaarea.net> > Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 12:43:36 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] Add more details about the configuration record applied thanks [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong. -- Voltaire
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel