On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:39 AM <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote: > > why? > > assuming the len is 1, the following code will access the next 3 > array anymore, I think it's better to check the i with len -2. > > for (i = 0; i < len; i += 3) { > to > for (i = 0; i < len - 2; i += 3) { > > for the return, I think it's correct to return the used length, > if it's error, have return already. right?
I doubt so. > > > -- > Thanks, > Limin Wang > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".