On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 1:39 AM <lance.lmw...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > why?
>
> assuming the len is 1, the following code will access the next 3
> array anymore, I think it's better to check the i with len -2.
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i += 3) {
> to
> for (i = 0; i < len - 2; i += 3) {
>
> for the return, I think it's correct to return the used length,
> if it's error, have return already. right?


I doubt so.

>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Limin Wang
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-devel mailing list
> ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
>
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to