On Thu, 23 Jun 2022, J. Dekker wrote:

Signed-off-by: J. Dekker <j...@itanimul.li>
---
tests/checkasm/hevc_add_res.c | 15 ++++++++-------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/checkasm/hevc_add_res.c b/tests/checkasm/hevc_add_res.c
index 0c896adaca..f17d121939 100644
--- a/tests/checkasm/hevc_add_res.c
+++ b/tests/checkasm/hevc_add_res.c
@@ -36,14 +36,14 @@
        }                                       \
    } while (0)

-#define randomize_buffers2(buf, size)             \
+#define randomize_buffers2(buf, size, mask)       \
    do {                                          \
        int j;                                    \
        for (j = 0; j < size; j++)                \
-            AV_WN16A(buf + j * 2, rnd() & 0x3FF); \
+            AV_WN16A(buf + j * 2, rnd() & mask); \
    } while (0)

-static void compare_add_res(int size, ptrdiff_t stride, int overflow_test)
+static void compare_add_res(int size, ptrdiff_t stride, int overflow_test, int 
mask)
{
    LOCAL_ALIGNED_32(int16_t, res0, [32 * 32]);
    LOCAL_ALIGNED_32(int16_t, res1, [32 * 32]);
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static void compare_add_res(int size, ptrdiff_t stride, int 
overflow_test)
    declare_func_emms(AV_CPU_FLAG_MMX, void, uint8_t *dst, int16_t *res, 
ptrdiff_t stride);

    randomize_buffers(res0, size);
-    randomize_buffers2(dst0, size);
+    randomize_buffers2(dst0, size, mask);
    if (overflow_test)
        res0[0] = 0x8000;
    memcpy(res1, res0, sizeof(*res0) * size);
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ static void compare_add_res(int size, ptrdiff_t stride, int 
overflow_test)
static void check_add_res(HEVCDSPContext h, int bit_depth)
{
    int i;
+    int mask = bit_depth == 8 ? 0xFFFF : bit_depth == 10 ? 0x03FF : 0x07FF;

Previously we always used the mask 0x03FF, while we now use 0xFFFF for 8 bit. I presume that means that for 8 bit, we mask two pixels with one 0xFFFF (and keep all bits), and previously we accidentally masked out everything but the lowest two bits, from every other pixel, in 8 bit mode?

The patch LGTM, but it'd be good to acknowledge this existing issue in the commit message.

// Martin

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to