On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 03:11:32PM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote:
> Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2022-11-25 14:38:46)
> > t   On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 05:45:29PM +1100, Peter Ross wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:56:51PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > > > Fixes: Timeout
> > > > Fixes: 
> > > > 53438/clusterfuzz-testcase-minimized-ffmpeg_AV_CODEC_ID_PICTOR_fuzzer-5458939919859712
> > > > 
> > > > Found-by: continuous fuzzing process 
> > > > https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz/tree/master/projects/ffmpe
> > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc>
> > > > ---
> > > >  libavcodec/pictordec.c | 3 +++
> > > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/libavcodec/pictordec.c b/libavcodec/pictordec.c
> > > > index 71bad40a0a..09229b94fd 100644
> > > > --- a/libavcodec/pictordec.c
> > > > +++ b/libavcodec/pictordec.c
> > > > @@ -162,6 +162,9 @@ static int decode_frame(AVCodecContext *avctx, 
> > > > AVFrame *frame,
> > > >  
> > > >      if (av_image_check_size(s->width, s->height, 0, avctx) < 0)
> > > >          return -1;
> > > > +    if (bytestream2_get_bytes_left(&s->g) < s->width * s->height / 
> > > > 65536 * 5)
> > > > +        return AVERROR_INVALIDDATA;
> > > 
> > > how did you arrive at this formula?
> > 
> > There are 2 coding modes, RLE and RAW
> > I assume usable raw images will need around W*H and thus more than RLE
> > RLE codes the most compressed runs by
> > 1 byte for val (=marker)
> > 1 byte run (=0)
> > 2 bytes run 
> > 1 byte val
> > thats 5 bytes and the maximum run we can code is 65535
> > 
> > The RLE decoder loop exits before applying the last RLE run and then
> > there is a seperate piece of code after it that fills the last color to
> > the end. Iam not sure why its done like that way but if i remove that
> > mid exit the seperate code piece becomes unused for all images i have
> > so it seems all RLE images are always fully coded with no special case
> > at the end.
> > Based on this iam guesing that my formula is correct for undamaged images
> > but of course i could find one tomorrow that exploits the special end
> > handling and breaks this formula
> > and of course its very possible that i missed some other thing that changes
> > this limit
> 
> This should be written in a comment above the code then, otherwise all
> future readers will be completely clueless.

good idea. ok, patch looks good.

-- Peter
(A907 E02F A6E5 0CD2 34CD 20D2 6760 79C5 AC40 DD6B)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to