Marvin Scholz (12022-12-19): > IIUC this means the `-mask_url` option has to be the first option passed, > which seems a bit of an unfortunate requirement and is not documented at > all, as far as I can see. So at least this should be clearly documented > to prevent users being confused why the get an unrecognised option error > when they do not pass it as the first option.
Indeed. And I see no reason to have this option processed specially like that; it requires at least an explanation. > I am a bit confused how this helps for the issue it tries to solve, as > for some amount of time, until this is done, it would expose the full > plaintext URL still, no? This is unavoidable. Still, having sensitive information visible for a fraction of a second is better than having sensitive information visible for the length of a playback or transcoding process. Regards, -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
