On 1/31/23, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote: > Paul B Mahol (12023-01-31): >> No, you do not. Calling your libavfilter framework code "complex" is >> disgrace >> to really complex code in non-framework part of libavfilter or else in >> FFmpeg libraries. >> >> libavfilter framework needs serious overhaul. >> It have numerous limitations and other stuff too much exposed to user, >> that really should not be. >> >> You do not maintain code at all, you just block patches and never >> contribute anymore anything useful besides blocking patches. > > … says the person who does not know that the duration between pts=3 and > pts=5 must be 2. > > This is a bad joke.
The patch just returned duration of frame from framesync and not actual duration of frame. And I have not tested it extensively at all or even thought about it much. Why? Because I find whole API including libavfilter very silly and broken and limited. At least I contributed numerous filters used in production, otherwise libavfilter would probably not exist today at all in this form at least. It would be already rewritten several times and/or whole idea abandoned completely because of lack of interest to develop it or poor usage. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
