On Sun, 2 Jul 2023, John Cox wrote:

On Sun, 2 Jul 2023 00:40:09 +0300 (EEST), you wrote:

On Thu, 29 Jun 2023, John Cox wrote:

Signed-off-by: John Cox <j...@kynesim.co.uk>
---
libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_init_aarch64.c |  20 ++++
libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_neon.S         | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 124 insertions(+)

diff --git a/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_init_aarch64.c 
b/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_init_aarch64.c
index 3ffaa07ab3..e75cf2f204 100644
--- a/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_init_aarch64.c
+++ b/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_init_aarch64.c
@@ -24,10 +24,29 @@
#include "libavfilter/bwdif.h"
#include "libavutil/aarch64/cpu.h"

+void ff_bwdif_filter_edge_neon(void *dst1, void *prev1, void *cur1, void 
*next1,
+                               int w, int prefs, int mrefs, int prefs2, int 
mrefs2,
+                               int parity, int clip_max, int spat);
+
void ff_bwdif_filter_intra_neon(void *dst1, void *cur1, int w, int prefs, int 
mrefs,
                                int prefs3, int mrefs3, int parity, int 
clip_max);


+static void filter_edge_helper(void *dst1, void *prev1, void *cur1, void 
*next1,
+                               int w, int prefs, int mrefs, int prefs2, int 
mrefs2,
+                               int parity, int clip_max, int spat)
+{
+    const int w0 = clip_max != 255 ? 0 : w & ~15;
+
+    ff_bwdif_filter_edge_neon(dst1, prev1, cur1, next1, w0, prefs, mrefs, 
prefs2, mrefs2,
+                              parity, clip_max, spat);
+
+    if (w0 < w)
+        ff_bwdif_filter_edge_c((char *)dst1 + w0, (char *)prev1 + w0, (char 
*)cur1 + w0, (char *)next1 + w0,
+                               w - w0, prefs, mrefs, prefs2, mrefs2,
+                               parity, clip_max, spat);
+}
+
static void filter_intra_helper(void *dst1, void *cur1, int w, int prefs, int 
mrefs,
                                int prefs3, int mrefs3, int parity, int 
clip_max)
{
@@ -52,5 +71,6 @@ ff_bwdif_init_aarch64(BWDIFContext *s, int bit_depth)
        return;

    s->filter_intra = filter_intra_helper;
+    s->filter_edge  = filter_edge_helper;
}

diff --git a/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_neon.S 
b/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_neon.S
index 6c5d1598f4..a33b235882 100644
--- a/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_neon.S
+++ b/libavfilter/aarch64/vf_bwdif_neon.S
@@ -128,6 +128,110 @@ coeffs:
        .hword          5570, 3801, 1016, -3801         // hf[0] = v0.h[2], 
-hf[1] = v0.h[5]
        .hword          5077, 981                       // sp[0] = v0.h[6]

+// ============================================================================
+//
+// void ff_bwdif_filter_edge_neon(
+//      void *dst1,     // x0
+//      void *prev1,    // x1
+//      void *cur1,     // x2
+//      void *next1,    // x3
+//      int w,          // w4
+//      int prefs,      // w5
+//      int mrefs,      // w6
+//      int prefs2,     // w7
+//      int mrefs2,     // [sp, #0]
+//      int parity,     // [sp, #8]
+//      int clip_max,   // [sp, #16]  unused
+//      int spat);      // [sp, #24]

This doesn't hold for macOS targets (and the checkasm tests fail on that
platform).

On macOS, arguments that aren't passed in registers but on the stack, are
tightly packed. So since parity is 32 bit and mrefs2 also was 32 bit,
parity is available at [sp, #4].

Therefore, it's usually simplest for portability reasons, to pass any
arguments after the first 8, as intptr_t or ptrdiff_t, as that makes them
consistent across platforms.

Not my interface - this is already existing code. What do you suggest I
do?

I'm happy either to change the interface or fix my stack offsets if
there is any clue that lets me detect this ABI. As personal preference
I'd choose the latter.

You can litter the code with "#ifdef __APPLE__", but in general I'd prefer to not go down that route as it makes the code messier to maintain, and explicitly requires you to test the code on both system combinations whenever touching it, compared to just having to test it once if there's a shared codepath.

We often do change function interfaces to make writing the assembly simpler; we often change parameters like "int stride" into "ptrdiff_t stride", to avoid needing explicit sign extension instructions on some architectures. Changing interfaces for this reason is less common though (we often don't have many functions that take that many parameters), but it shouldn't require a lot of changes for other architectures with existing assembly.

// Martin

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to