On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:04:16PM +0200, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote: > Michael Niedermayer: > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > --- > > doc/developer.texi | 9 +++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.texi > > index 383120daaa..1c0091fc74 100644 > > --- a/doc/developer.texi > > +++ b/doc/developer.texi > > @@ -856,6 +856,15 @@ way to get everyone's patches reviewed sooner. > > Reviews must be constructive and when rejecting a patch the reviewer must > > explain > > their reasons and ideally suggest an alternative approach. > > > > +If a change is pushed without being sent to ffmpeg-devel, the developer > > +pushing it must annouce doing so on the ffmpeg-devel mailing list > > immedeatly. > > +@example > > +forgot a semicolon in this patch, pushed a seperate fix > > +pushed my new autograd engine and stable diffusion filter. Didnt want to > > +go through the bikeshed if that belongs in FFmpeg, go to the GA if you want > > +it removed. Otherwise Just tell me what i should improve and ill look into > > it. > > +@end example > > This encourages pushing patches (even completely new filters) without > sending them to the ML.
That was not the intend but if you look at "cvslog" and ffmpeg-devel, you will
notice that there are things being pushed that have not been seen on the
ffmpeg-devel mailing list.
thx
[...]
--
Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB
Old school: Use the lowest level language in which you can solve the problem
conveniently.
New school: Use the highest level language in which the latest supercomputer
can solve the problem without the user falling asleep waiting.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
