On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:03 AM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12023-11-02): > > I analyzed it already, It is very sorry state of libavfilter that > buffersrc > > keeps sending frames to EOF filtergraph. > > So, Paul, I will explain this to you one last time. > > Remember high school, when you had math test, and if you just gave the > result you got almost no points even if the result was correct? That was > because solving a math exercise is not just about finding the result, it > is about showing how you reach the result and proving that the result is > correct. > > The same goes here. On your own projects, you can change randomly the > code until a bug is no longer triggered and call it fixed. > > But in FFmpeg, you are not alone, and when a change is not trivial you > have to prove to your fellow developers that it is correct and > necessary. > > So get to work, produce that proof, re-submit the patch with the proof > in the commit message, and then we can talk. > > As it is, the need to switch buffersrc to activate is not established, > and therefore it should not be done. > I do not understand. What proof you need? Have you even tested this JEEB script without patches applied? It should straight forward cause OOM bomb. Have you noticed that buffersrc filter never checks outlink status of its output link? > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
