On 07/11/2023 20:38, epira...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 Nov 2023, at 16:57, Frank Plowman wrote:
Resolves #10636 (http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10636)
Texinfo 7.0, released in November 2022, changed the names of various
functions. Compiling docs with Texinfo 7.0 results in warnings and
improperly formatted documentation. More old names appear to have
been removed in Texinfo 7.1, released October 2023, which causes docs
compilation to fail.
This PR addresses the issue by adding logic to switch between the old
and new function names depending on the Texinfo version. Texinfo 6.8
produces identical documentation before and after the patch. The change
to the CSS makes the documentation generated by Texinfo >= 7.0 appear
more similar to that generated by Texinfo <= 6.8.
CC
https://www.mail-archive.com/debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org/msg1938238.html
https://bugs.gentoo.org/916104
Signed-off-by: Frank Plowman <p...@frankplowman.com>
Thanks!
Just had a quick look and was wondering why your patch touches the
bootstrap.min.css?
Texinfo 7.0 produces quite different HTML to Texinfo 6.8. Without that
change to the CSS, enumerated option flags (i.e. Possible values of x
are...) render as white text on a white background with Texinfo 7.0 and
are unreadable. The change removes a style for the selector `.table
.table` which causes the background to turn white. As far as I can tell,
it is not actually used anywhere in files generated by Texinfo 6.8.
--
https://www.frankplowman.com/
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
