Le torstaina 9. marraskuuta 2023, 22.45.35 EET Alexander Strasser a écrit : > I can't see how the reason for the presence of code can be ultimately > defined objectively and non-arbitrary.
Ultimately, this was discussed and decided in a meeting, which Michael attended (albeit remotely) and for which meeting notes were published. That being the case, I don't see why Andreas should have to perform extensive testing and write extensive justification. He could have done and that would have been nice, but that is all. In this situation, it is up to whoever disagrees (and presumably was not in the meeting) to provide extensive justification why the decision should be reversed. And I'm not seeing any such thing. Also anything to shrink the amount of MMX code Looks Good To Me. -- 雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙 http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".