On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 9:46 PM Michael Niedermayer <mich...@niedermayer.cc> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 02:26:22PM +0000, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > [...] > > I would not find it acceptable for SPI to pay these costs. I do not feel > > donors would want their money spent on a corporate show in Las Vegas. > > all SPI refunds must be posted to the mailing list and approved by the > FFmpeg community. > I have 0 clue if anything like this will be posted by anyone. But if its > not, there is no way SPI can pay it and if it is then everyone has an > oppertunity to object. > If theres no consensus to fund something then stefano and me will not > approve it. And SPI will not pay it. > > So if a few people are against it and they state that publically in > the corresponding REFUND thread then there is NO way SPI can pay it > > I cannot comment on anything else
To be clear I have no issue with reimbursements for small booths at SCALE, LinuxTAG, FOSDEM etc. But NAB is a big corporate show with very large costs for graphics, furniture, union builders etc (put a number in your head and add two zeroes to the end) and I don't feel donors would want their money spent on this. Regards, Kieran Kunhya _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
