On Fri, 1 Dec 2023, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Le 30 novembre 2023 23:13:59 GMT+02:00, "Martin Storsjö" <mar...@martin.st> a
écrit :
On Thu, 30 Nov 2023, Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
In other words, is publishing on the FATE website worth making the
tests coverage and/or the build time worse?
By making the test coverage worse, you mean if I'd be doing the full
testing of many combinations already, and I'd stop doing that in order
to do this lesser testing instead? If I'd be doing it (I currently
don't) I guess that would be my concern, not others?
No. The point is that this is adding a small hack that works for one
specific case for a short while (testing Armv8 IMM8 and DP), but is
known not to be sufficient anyway (for SVE, PAuth, RVV, etc).
I'll reiterate the question from the bottom of the mail, that you didn't
respond to.
Would you be ok with a setup, where a FATE instance optionally can run a
subset of tests instead of the full suite, but run them multiple times
with e.g. different QEMU settings? That would allow repeating checkasm for
all the interesting cases - and if one really wanted to spend a lot of CPU
time on it, also could run the full FATE suite in all those
configurations.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
