Le torstaina 7. joulukuuta 2023, 10.59.06 EET Nicolas George a écrit : > Jean-Baptiste Kempf (12023-12-07): > > Why? > > Because after twelve years libav has finally managed to take control and > FFmpeg is now essentially dead.
The question was for Paul. Even if you take Anton's knee-jerk threats of reverts as LibAV-think, they were but the last straw (Paul wrote as much). You have had heated arguments against Paul in recent times too. You have also argued a lot of exercising your review privileges, which sounds like a very libavish notion to me - a LibAV notion that made into written down FFmpeg project rules. As a matter of fact, regardless of who was right or wrong, and whence, I can only _observe_ that Paul did complain specifically about you on the IRC channel. To be fair, he also abundantly abused JB there, although I do not know how much of it was sarcasm vs actual attack. But in any case, by that same logic, you could also be "thank[ed] for your contribution in this". In my opinion, this would be unfair to you, and accordingly, you are being unfair to whomever you designate by "libav". (For the sake of utmost clarity, I am not so vain as to consider myself a part of the former project known as libav with however few contributions I made thereto.) > Thank you for your contribution in this. @CC: Yes, that second sentence can be construed as an ad hominem against Anton. Feel free to ban me. -- 雷米‧德尼-库尔蒙 http://www.remlab.net/ _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".