> Possible address trac issue:
http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/10763
I don't like the random generator as it is, because the first two random numbers
are very close to zero, as can be shown with this command line:
ffmpeg -loglevel repeat -f lavfi -i nullsrc=size=1x1,format=gray -vf
"geq=lum='print(random(0));print(random(0));print(random(0));print(random(0))'"
-frames 1 -y out.png 0.000000 0.000091 0.285346 0.929202 This behaviour
can be improved by inizializing the generator with a large number as
seed value. I'm not sure if it's a good idea to share the same variables
for ld() and st() (as double) and random() (as unsigned int). Wouldn't
it be better to use separate variables for random()? Michael
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
