On 15 Jul, Michael Niedermayer wrote : > longer awnser, > videolan IIUC would be willing to host some of our services > on their existing server but this would require a "quite a bit" of > work. videolan uses LXC we do not.
Indeed, and there is a good reason for that, called security. > also videolan of course would have to agree to everything, its their > server of course ... VideoLAN has very powerfull machines, connected in a correct datacenter, with a contract, that will outlive any single member. Don't take it bad, but seeing the discussions, and the way you manage your roots and services migration, you don't seem to care that much about being correctly deployed, but to do it fast. LXC provides service separation and avoid security issues to propagate, and allows also reuse of VideoLAN infrastructure, if needed (SMTP, same Web proxy, etc...). It allows VLC and non-VLC services to not conflict, and allows people to have only access to one LXC. I understand that you do not care about such security, but we do. With my kindest regards, -- Jean-Baptiste Kempf http://www.jbkempf.com/ - +33 672 704 734 Sent from my Electronic Device _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel