Hi,
Le 13 février 2024 18:22:46 GMT+02:00, Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> a écrit : >Martin Storsjo (12024-02-13): >> The main arguments raised were about API consistency, prevention of >> accidental inclusions, as well as explicitness in marking a field as >> public or private. > >Too bad the committee neglected to ask for the arguments of the people >who opposed this. Like having a trial and not listening to the defense. Speaking as an elected member of another OSS project's TC, I believe that the experienced adult developers on the FFmpeg TC are perfectly capable of reading mailing archives and Trac comments as necessary. In fact, I think it is preferable that they stick to arguments made in public, rather than go out of their way to dig up private information. Or to follow your metaphor, in a trial, the arguments are made before the jury in public sessions. The deliberations of the jury are kept private to shield members from external pressure. I don't expect that antagonising the TC members will do you, and any potential future arguments of yours, much good. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
