Rémi Denis-Courmont (12024-02-18): > I trust that you do know the meaning of the auxillary "should". That very > definitely and very obviously eliminates any "maximalist" interpretations.
Indeed. And I repeat what I already said in another mail: If somebody dishonest wants to exploit that loophole, if somebody does not do what the rules say they do, then the GA should do it for them. > The maximalist interpretation is clearly nonsensical as per reductio ad > absurdum. The maximalist interpretation was what was intended. The maximalist interpretation also was what Anton understood when the rule was put in place. It is a little hypocritical to pretend is means something else now. In fact, if you want to know everything, the current situation was EXACTLY what I had in mind when I proposed the rule in the first place. Including the identity of the TC with a conflict of interest. > This is a *guideline* or *recommendation*, and obviously it > _cannot_ > be applied to its logic extreme. Human rules are never meant to be applied to their logic extreme, arguments of this kind are bullshit. > Instead Anton, and later rach other TC member will have to each determine for > themselves if they are so implicated in the disagreement as to justify > recusing themselves. > > Gyan does not get to dictate it, and neither do you or I. There is no point > arguing this further, and I won't. Gyan can call for a vote of no confidence in the TC or one of its members. -- Nicolas George _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
