According to S377M, segmented frame layout is identical to separate
field layout except that the two fields are taken from a single scan
of the incoming image, ie: they are coincident in time. Thus the
resulting frame is progressive.
---
libavformat/mxfdec.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavformat/mxfdec.c b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
index 27dd5bc..0495a2e 100644
--- a/libavformat/mxfdec.c
+++ b/libavformat/mxfdec.c
@@ -2002,10 +2002,6 @@ static int mxf_parse_structural_metadata(MXFContext *mxf)
st->codec->width = descriptor->width;
st->codec->height = descriptor->height; /* Field height, not frame
height */
switch (descriptor->frame_layout) {
- case SegmentedFrame:
- /* This one is a weird layout I don't fully understand. */
- av_log(mxf->fc, AV_LOG_INFO, "SegmentedFrame layout isn't
currently supported\n");
- break;
case FullFrame:
st->codec->field_order = AV_FIELD_PROGRESSIVE;
break;
@@ -2017,6 +2013,8 @@ static int mxf_parse_structural_metadata(MXFContext *mxf)
It's also for compatibility with the old
behavior. */
case MixedFields:
break;
+ case SegmentedFrame:
+ st->codec->field_order = AV_FIELD_PROGRESSIVE;
case SeparateFields:
switch (descriptor->field_dominance) {
case MXF_TFF:
--
2.4.6
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
