Hi, On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 1:28 PM Hendrik Leppkes <h.lepp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 7:16 PM Lynne via ffmpeg-devel > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > I'd hate to apply fixes with no information in shared code. This can get > > removed with no information about what relies on it. > > Changing 5 different hwaccel modules to avoid one line here seems > rather silly, doesn't it? > We can add a comment, if that helps. > Comment is a good idea, I think Lynne is right there's a risk we accidentally remove it. Generally, I'd like to see more hwaccel fate coverage, e.g. a vaapi (or whatever) fate machine that runs relevant tests using hw decoder instead of sw decoder. That would protect against the same risk. Ronald _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
