Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-07-09 15:28:10) > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 03:17:58PM +0200, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > > ensure width and height fit in 32bit > > > > why? > > because not everyone wants undefined behavior > because not everyone wants security issues > because we dont support width and height > 32bit and its easier to check in a > central place > because the changed codes purpose is to check if the image paramaters are > within what we support, and width of 100 billion is not. You can try > all encoders with 100billion width. Then try to decode. > Iam curious, how many work, how many fail and how they fail > how many invalid bitstreams with no warning, how many undefined > behaviors, ... > > Simply building FFmpeg on a platform with 64bit ints doesnt update > ISO and ITU standards to allow larger values
Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2020-10-07 16:45:56): > At least in code i wrote and write i consider it a bug if it would > assume sizeof(int/unsigned) == 4 Make up your mind. -- Anton Khirnov _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
