On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 2:06 AM, Clément Bœsch <u...@pkh.me> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:17:15PM -0400, Ganesh Ajjanagadde wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:03 PM, Ganesh Ajjanagadde >> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Timothy Gu <timothyg...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:03 PM Ganesh Ajjanagadde >> >> <gajjanaga...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> - avio_printf(pb, "Running as pid %d.\n", stream->pid); >> >>> + avio_printf(pb, "Running as pid %ld.\n", (int64_t) >> >>> stream->pid); >> >> >> >> >> >> You need `"%" PRIi64` as the format specifier. >> > >> > You are right. Thanks, will post updated patch. >> >> So I used PRId64 instead of PRIi64. >> Is there an issue with that? >> > > I don't think so
You are right, see e.g https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1893490/difference-between-format-specifiers-i-and-d-in-printf and relevant standards quote therein. > > -- > Clément B. > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
