On 6/1/2025 11:07 PM, softworkz . wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> On Behalf Of softworkz .
Sent: Samstag, 31. Mai 2025 03:44
To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org>
Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] fftools/ffmpeg_filter: make
InputFilterPriv and OutputFilterPriv private again

[..]

7 lines further down, there's another change needed:


         if (ofilter->output_name && ofilter->filter)
             av_dict_set(&output_map, ofilter->filter->name, ofilter-
output_name, 0);


This is what broke the graph connections on the output side.

Thanks
sw

_______________________________________________


Hello James,

I have seen you already pushed this.

What I would like to note is that you could have just asked me
and I would have done it myself. This goes without saying.

I pushed the set because i authored it. No point asking someone else to do it. I did however forget to send a reply acknowledging your review and LGTM before pushing it.


I'm still saying it because I've already seen a satement
of something like "had to clean up your mess" or similar.
Though, nobody "has to". Just tell me and I'll do it, unless
you're having fun doing it.

Not telling me and later saying "I had to..." - that's not
valid. (just hypothetically, I'm not saying you did)

Please talk to me next time, I don't bite.

PS: you might be upset at the moment, but I've been 10
     times more for sure

I'm not.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to