Hi Marth64 On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 11:06:47AM -0500, Marth64 wrote: > On Sun, Jun 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM Kacper Michajlow > <kasper93-at-gmail....@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > Maybe it's time to retire the trac? It is quite slow by design and not > > really actively maintained anymore. Holding onto legacy software > > always increases the burden of maintainability. > > I do feel that a good portion of wiki technical documentation can > probably be moved to the main docs.
The wiki has the huge advantage that people can edit it easily Editing the docs people have to do a git checkout, edit a file with an editor, make a git commit read patch submission rules submit a patch to ML or forge. Thats alot stumbling blocks thrown in ones way > There are some good examples and information there that seem to me can > be crystallized into plain old texi. > While I'm neutral about Trac I think in a sense this could also help > in the sense of reducing server load for this somewhat static content. yesterdays incident had like ~40k accesses on teh same file. So moving 99% of content out of trac would not have helped if that file was in teh 1% thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Let us carefully observe those good qualities wherein our enemies excel us and endeavor to excel them, by avoiding what is faulty, and imitating what is excellent in them. -- Plutarch
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
