Hello,

Thank you for the feedback.

You are right and the changes to h264_slice.c seem redundant. I will remove that. and run the tests again.

Should I make two differents commits to change qp_table.c and qp_table.h ?

Thanks,

Timothée

On 16/06/2025 à 11:32, Andreas Rheinhardt wrote :

Timothee:
Hello,

Thank you for the feedback on my first patch. The corruption was likely
caused by my email client's text formatting.

The patch is attach to prevent any formatting error.

I have check the patch file applies cleanly using `git am` and verified
that all FATE tests still pass.

Please let me know if this version is correct. Any advice is welcome.

Thanks,
Timothée

1. Commits should be small atomic units; changes to different libraries
in the same commit are almost always not of this type.
2. Both ff_h264_decode_mb_cabac() and ff_h264_decode_mb_cavlc() already
set qscale_table on their own (on success), so that all the changes to
h264_slice.c seem completely redundant.

- Andreas

_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to