I noticed that the output from actually tagging buffers with the new
states needs patching as well, is there any other place I need to
update?
Kevin
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Wheatley
<kevin.j.wheat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As a starting point for my work, I'm wondering about the naming of
> these options in the following patch to add the additional transfer
> characteristics from H.265.
>
> I'm not entirely happy with the names as they read a little
> ambiguously SMPTE ST vs SMP TEST, obviously I could add another
> underscore...
>
> Thoughts
>
> Kevin
From 403a209cfe8ebee7caca35b678f8d529e8ae5390 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kevin Wheatley <kevin.j.wheat...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 12:34:34 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] Add SMPTE ST 2084 and ST 428-1 pixel descriptions
---
libavutil/pixdesc.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/libavutil/pixdesc.c b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
index eb52113..4ef5d83 100644
--- a/libavutil/pixdesc.c
+++ b/libavutil/pixdesc.c
@@ -2013,13 +2013,14 @@ static const char *color_range_names[AVCOL_RANGE_NB] = {
static const char *color_primaries_names[AVCOL_PRI_NB] = {
"reserved", "bt709", "unknown", "reserved", "bt470m",
"bt470bg", "smpte170m", "smpte240m", "film", "bt2020",
+ "smpte428_1",
};
static const char *color_transfer_names[AVCOL_TRC_NB] = {
"reserved", "bt709", "unknown", "reserved", "bt470m",
"bt470bg", "smpte170m", "smpte240m", "linear", "log100",
"log316", "iec61966-2-4", "bt1361e", "iec61966-2-1",
- "bt2020-10", "bt2020-20",
+ "bt2020-10", "bt2020-20", "smpte2084", "smpte428-1",
};
static const char *color_space_names[AVCOL_SPC_NB] = {
--
1.7.1
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
