On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 02:58:44 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > some people use webp apparently, and we have no decoder > > There are 2 patchsets > Thilos v13 (native decoder) > Peters libwebp based one > > I tested both and thilos code decodes the files from the 4709 ticket > i was not able to decode anything with peters patch. Iam not sure it > needs some demuxer changes that are missing it also didnt work with > the demuxer chanegs from thilos pacthset. > > What i suggest is ... can we just apply thilos patchset ? > > what do people think about that idea ? > > It does have a review comment about use of nested decoders and direct > rendering not working. But honestly. That decoder (maybe marked as > experimental?) seems better than having no decoder
i say go for it. +experimental. once its in , we can see if web browsers use it, then maybe they'll take up the mantle. -compn _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
