On Sat, 28 Jun 2025 at 16:35, Kacper Michajlow <kaspe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 at 17:06, Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 31 mai 2025 20:40:40 GMT+03:00, Marton Balint <c...@passwd.hu> a écrit : > > > > > > > > >On Sat, 31 May 2025, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > > >> This allows adjusting them to exactly match whatever is fastest on > > >> a given CPU for each type. > > > > > >Did you use some tool to make this patch, or it was just manual work? > > > > > >Can't you use C11 generics to make this somewhat automatic? > > > > So I tried to do exactly that, but you need multiple levels of generics. In > > the end, either the compiler crashed or my entire build system crashed > > because the compiler consumed too much memory. > > Could you elaborate on the problem? I too think that _Generic is the > way to go here, instead error-prone manual dispatch of the MIN/MAX > functions. Also with _Generic we can substitute with an inline > function to fix double evaluation issues. (and whole patch would be > few lines instead of changing whole source tree) > > If you let us help you fix the problem you were facing, I think we can > arrive at a good solution for the problem here.
That being said, what's wrong with that solution? https://godbolt.org/z/To3hvf577 Of course this won't work for const initializers in C, but I suspect those can be handled differently if needed and it's not a big deal. - Kacper _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
