Hi Pierre, Do you maybe have a patch that would work with the latest ffmpeg version?
Best Regards, Gregor On Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 10:48 AM Pierre Le Fevre via ffmpeg-devel < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pierre Le Fevre <pierre.lefe...@netinsight.net> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:48:09 +0000 > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: Passthrough SCTE 35 > Current behavior breaks SCTE 35 by wrapping it in a PES packet, this adds > the logic for the SCTE 35 messages to be passed through cleanly. > Hi Devin, > I saw your patch but noticed it was still not merged. Since it’s more > comprehensive, I’m all for merging your patch instead of mine if it’s not > too stale. > > Best, > Pierre > > From: ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org> on behalf of Devin > Heitmueller <devin.heitmuel...@ltnglobal.com> > Date: Wednesday, 11 June 2025 at 16:32 > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Cc: Pierre Le Fevre <pierre.lefe...@netinsight.net> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: Passthrough SCTE 35 > Current behavior breaks SCTE 35 by wrapping it in a PES packet, this adds > the logic for the SCTE 35 messages to be passed through cleanly. > *EXTERNAL EMAIL*- Use caution before opening links or attachments > > Hello Pierre, > > On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 10:22 AM Pierre Le Fevre via ffmpeg-devel > <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Pierre Le Fevre <pierre.lefe...@netinsight.net> > > To: "ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org" <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > > Cc: > > Bcc: > > Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 14:22:29 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: Passthrough SCTE 35 Current behavior > breaks SCTE 35 by wrapping it in a PES packet, this adds the logic for the > SCTE 35 messages to be passed through cleanly. > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Le Fevre <pierre.lefe...@netinsight.net> > > For what it's worth, I submitted a similar patch series a couple of > years ago, which also accommodates modifying the pts_adjust field > (which is mandatory if the output stream's clocks are rebased). > > https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2023-July/312417.html > > Devin > -- > Devin Heitmueller, Senior Software Engineer > LTN Global Communications > o: +1 (301) 363-1001 > w: https://ltnglobal.com e: devin.heitmuel...@ltnglobal.com > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Pierre Le Fevre via ffmpeg-devel <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> > Cc: Pierre Le Fevre <pierre.lefe...@netinsight.net> > Bcc: > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 08:48:09 +0000 > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat/mpegts: Passthrough SCTE 35 > Current behavior breaks SCTE 35 by wrapping it in a PES packet, this adds > the logic for the SCTE 35 messages to be passed through cleanly. > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". > _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
