Le tiistaina 1. heinäkuuta 2025, 13.58.23 Itä-Euroopan kesäaika Alexander Strasser via ffmpeg-devel a écrit : > (...) I want this thread to start a discussion, that eventually leads > to a policy about submitting and integrating "AI" generated content.
Well, you can define a policy and/or make a public statement on FFmpeg.org, but as others said, just like we can't prevent someone misattributing their contributions and violating copyrights, we can't credibly prevent (mis)use of LLMs to generate code. There is also a problem of definition. While I don't personally use computer assistance, I think it's fine to use language servers to automatically generate or suggests boilerplate, possible contextual completions, etc. While this sort of technology predates LLMs and is clearly distinct from it **at the moment**, it's going to be hard to define "AI" and where to draw a line. Ultimately, I think you need to define the problem(s) as far as FFmpeg-devel is concerned. Potential copyright violations are not new, and I think the current policies and license terms are adequate, regardless of AI. Low quality patches are also not really a new problem, and they can be rejected with the current processes too. *Maybe* LLM usage will (willingly or unwittingly) lead to a denial of service attacks on the review capacity and motivation of the FFmpeg-devel, TC and GA membership, but that remains highly speculative, and I think we don't need to solve that what-if problem yet. And again, this attack does not necessarily need an LLM to be carried. -- ヅニ-クーモン・レミ Tapio's place new town, former Finnish Republic of Uusimaa _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
