On 8 Jul 2025, at 20:33, Nicolas George wrote:
> Marvin Scholz (HE12025-07-08): >> That's already possible with `-tls_verify 0` > > Then the commit message inadequately explains what the patch does. > Please clarify. Sure, I will add a more verbose message. However note that verification was already done before my patch, when enabled, just not taking the host into account but all other aspects of the cert. > >> (which is actually the default, arguably shouldn't be IMHO but >> thats a different topic) > > A transition period where only a warning is printed would be necessary. How could that work though? Warn for every tls use in ffmpeg unless the user explicitly specifies -tls_verify 1 or -tls_verify 0? I think a lot of people would complain about that? But I agree we probably can't just change the behavior without making people aware of it before… > > Regards, > > -- > Nicolas George > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
